Farmville and privacy lost
Facebook applications used to acquire personal information by third party companies. PeaceReporter interviewed the lawyer Daniele Minotti, an expert on computer crime.
survey by the Wall Street Journal revealed that many of the most popular Facebook applications would be used to send confidential information of users to tens of other companies that, in turn, use them for commercial purposes. In practice, anyone who spends their time playing in Farmville, about 59 million users worldwide, would be subject to a possible sale of their data is not allowed. At the center of the investigation there are other famous Aplications as Texas Hold'em poker, 36 million users, and Mafia Wars, 21 million users. The round of generally involves not only those who play in first person but also their friends, in a circuit by half a billion people and over 550mila applications. "Not all produced by Facebook" stressed the spokesman for the social-network that promise to increase controls. But the creature was born from the mind of Mark Zuckerberg, who only this year had a turnover of 1.1 billion dollars, is proving more and more like a loose cannon in the panorama of the world wide web. The U.S. government has already promised to strict controls avoid the danger of terrorism and today, who has fun in the virtual farm, can be seen stealing the data. What happens to the site of the faces? PeaceReporter has asked Daniele Minotti, criminal defense lawyer specializing in computer crimes and new technologies.
lawyer how does this flaw in the system of Facebook?
Facebook has been repeatedly indexing for privacy. The same father, Zuckerberg has always dribbled the issue. Only recently, on the basis of intense pressure, decided to make a program that protects confidentiality. The bugs in the programs are on the agenda, the question is whether they are wanted or not. In this case it is probably a bug unforeseen, unpredictable, and something negligent, grossly negligent, in my opinion. We do not exclude the fact that the data is still a wealth of information is very important in life. It might be that sometimes, certain flaws are desired to allow third parties to steal people's data.
Facebook provides a degree of privacy. If you do not comply this duty may be terminated?
When Facebook gives us access to an application normally tells us to pay attention to our privacy, warning that the data could be transmitted to third parties. So the platform is protected from the outset. It follows that with the Facebook we can take a little. Facebook is certainly easy enough to manage these things in the sense that passing the buck and meanwhile cashing in some profits. Why, of course, what starts out on his platform if he does pay. We must make a distinction: if there is a clear desire to capture these data with the applications, then it is the only responsible party. A Facebook can be sufficient advance warning before entering this program. If there is a flaw, however, we need to see where the leak is. If facebook's side or application side. In this case you can not charge anything to Facebook.
is lawful for a third company offered to contact a user or publicity, without your explicit consent?
Lately there is the issue of call centers. Phone is the famous log opt-out for which a person must clearly state no longer wish to be contacted by a certain company. But this does not apply to other forms of advertising. The moment has a third given to contact me, the number of phone, email, a facebook profile, that's one of my personal data and can not handle it without my consent and without giving me the information. The problem is that these treatments are often outside of Italy, the United States at best, or even in places with weak laws on the subject. Which, of course, raises a problem of intersection of local and international rules that eventually breaks down and makes little exercise his right.
What can end users do not see their data in the database of advertising companies?
You must learn to defend themselves first. It is bad to say, in the sense that it should to enforce the law by others. People should know that each application outside, so Facebook is potentially dangerous for privacy. In fact, prevention is better than cure: the user has to understand what he does with a computer and realize that certain behaviors are at risk. Apart from the fact that it would generally improve computer literacy and communication technology. The user must start with a sort of prejudice and do not think that a good thing does not lead to problems. In fact, usually quite funny play is a red herring. We must also understand that no one does anything for nothing and when someone provides a simple platform game he does to get an advantage. And the advantage is often to create a database that are invaluable assets. Having a mountain of data to use in their own or resell to third parties, is an activity that can often be really lucrative.
Source: http://it.peacereporter.net
0 comments:
Post a Comment